{"id":158,"date":"2015-03-24T11:23:20","date_gmt":"2015-03-24T11:23:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/demo.themegrill.com\/colormag\/?p=158"},"modified":"2019-10-28T08:43:57","modified_gmt":"2019-10-28T08:43:57","slug":"fastest-plane-in-the-world","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hempstry.net\/index.php\/2015\/03\/24\/fastest-plane-in-the-world\/","title":{"rendered":"Fastest plane in the world"},"content":{"rendered":"

The SR-71\u2019s JP-7 fuel\u2014which also had to be carried onboard specialized\u00a0KC-135Q\u00a0tankers to refuel the Blackbird\u2014was designed to be a safe, high-flashpoint fuel that would not vaporize or blow up under extreme heat and pressure. It had such low volatility that one could supposedly extinguish a match in a puddle of JP-7. But that also meant that the fuel was difficult to ignite using the convention systems, which meant Lockheed had to develop a\u00a0triethylborane-based\u00a0chemical ignition system for the SR-71\u2019s engines\u2014adding to the jet\u2019s complexity and maintenance costs.<\/em><\/p>\n

Capable of cruising at speeds in excess of Mach 3.2, the Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird was the fastest air-breathing manned aircraft to ever to see operational service. But even though its performance has never been matched, the SR-71 was retired as the Cold War drew to a close.<\/p>\n

The Blackbird was initially retired in 1990, even before the fall of the Soviet Union. Eventually, however, three of the jets were reactivated by the Air Force\u2014at the insistence of Congress\u2014for a brief period between 1995 and 1998. Meanwhile, NASA flew research missions with the aircraft until 1999. In the end, the Blackbird was retired without a true replacement. But why?<\/p>\n

Ultimately, while the SR-71 delivered unparalleled performance, it\u00a0was its operating costs that condemned<\/u><\/a>\u00a0the Blackbird to early retirement. Moreover, the U.S. Air Force had doubts about the aircraft\u2019s survivability versus a new generation of Soviet (and later Russian) air defenses and interceptors\u2014like the SA-10 Grumble (and other advanced S-300 derivatives) and\u00a0MiG-31\u00a0Foxhounds. In fact, the Air Force actively resisted congressional attempts to revive the program during the\u00a01990s\u00a0because of those very reasons.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe Air Force decision to retire the Blackbirds in 1990 is based on several factors. In congressional testimony, Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Larry D. Welch identified the increased survivability of reconnaissance satellites, SR-71 vulnerability to the Soviet SAM-5 surface-to-air missile and the cost of maintaining the SR-71 fleet. The cost factor is the most significant to the Air Force because it limits expenditures in other areas. Reagan Administration Air Force Secretary Edward C. Aldridge Jr. estimated that the money used to operate the SR-71 fleet could operate and maintain two tactical fighter wings.\u201d<\/p>\n

Indeed, by some accounts, the SR-71 cost as much as $200,000 per hour to operate when all of its ancillary expenses were factored in. Part of that cost stemmed from the fact that it was a small specialized fleet. Because of the small number of jets built\u2014thirty-two\u2014and its unique design, the SR-71 was a maintenance hog. It also required a specialized logistical train\u2014particularly for its exotic fuel\u2014which cost\u00a0$18,000 per hour<\/u><\/a>\u00a0in 1989 dollars.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n<\/body>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"